County ignition interlock program plan
Compiled text through Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through Jul 29, 2026
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Dates and status
- Compiling agency
- Executive Department
- Text status
- Source receipt
- Compiled text through
- Sep 15, 2021
- Register checked through
- July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
- Activity status
- Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
- Latest notice
- HLT-07-26-00004-P · Proposed rule · Feb 18, 2026
- Source snapshot
- Jun 6, 2026
(a)Every county shall establish a county ignition interlock program plan with respect to usage of ignition interlock devices and monitoring the compliance of an operator subject to installation of an ignition interlock device with monitoring as directed by a criminal court. Such plan shall be approved by the county executive. A county may submit an amended plan on its own initiative, which shall be approved by the county executive. Where a plan has been amended by the county, in whole or in part, it shall be promptly filed with the division in advance of its effective date. The division may also require modification or updates of any county plan or amended plan as it deems necessary to be consistent with law or regulatory provisions.
(b)Every county shall develop a plan in consultation with the county's probation director, district attorney, and in New York City the district attorney from each of the five boroughs, sheriff or police commissioner where applicable, STOP-DWI coordinator, a representative of its drinking driver program where applicable and where more than one program exists in the county, a representative designated by the county executive, a superior and local criminal court judge designated by the administrative judge for the county, and in New York City a superior and local criminal court judge designated by the deputy chief administrative judge, a representative of an agency providing legal services to those unable to afford counsel in criminal cases designated by the county executive. Nothing herein shall prohibit a county from consulting with other persons or entities as the county executive deems appropriate with respect to development of its plan.
(c)Every plan shall specify monitoring by the probation department where the operator is subject to a period of either interim probation supervision or probation and may designate one or more alternative persons or entities, in lieu of the probation department, responsible for monitoring where an ignition interlock device has been:
(1)imposed pursuant to a conditional discharge; or
(2)imposed by court order in advance of sentencing requiring monitoring.
An alternative person or entity may include but is not limited to the sheriff, police commissioner, district attorney, STOP-DWI coordinator, traffic safety board representative, Drinking Driver Program, Treatment Alternative for Safer Communities Program, or any other similar individual, agency, or organization. Nothing shall preclude a county from sharing monitoring resources, including equipment, with another county to effectuate the provisions of this Part.
(d)Every plan at a minimum shall:
(1)designate the persons or entities, or combination thereof, responsible for monitoring an operator's compliance with an ignition interlock requirement in cases where an operator does not receive either a period of interim probation supervision or probation; establish that where an operator is under either interim probation supervision or probation, the probation department selects the specific class and features of the ignition interlock device available from a qualified manufacturer in its region. The operator may select the model of the ignition interlock device, meeting the specific class and features selected by the probation department from a qualified manufacturer in the operator's region of residence;
(2)establish that where an operator has received a sentence of conditional discharge, the monitor shall select the class of ignition interlock device available from a qualified manufacturer in its region for any such operator. The operator may select the model of the ignition interlock device from within the class designated by the monitor from a qualified manufacturer in the operator's region of residence;
(3)establish that where an operator has been court ordered to install an ignition interlock device in advance of sentencing with monitoring, other than interim probation supervision, the monitor shall select the class and features of ignition interlock device available from a qualified manufacturer in its region for any such operator. The operator may select the model of the ignition interlock device from within the class designated by the monitor from a qualified manufacturer in the operator’s region of residence;
(4)in the event more than one qualified manufacturer does business within its region, the county shall establish an equitable procedure for manufacturers to provide ignition interlock devices without costs where an operator has been determined financially unable to afford the costs and has received a waiver from the criminal court. The equitable procedure should be based upon proportion of ignition interlock devices paid to each qualified manufacturer by operators in the county;
(5)through any available funding earmarked for such purpose, establish a distribution formula for probation supervision and/or monitoring purposes associated with this Part;
(6)establish a procedure whereby the probation department and any other monitor will be notified no later than five business days from the date an ignition interlock condition is imposed by the criminal court, any court approval authorizing reduction in breath sample as authorized by section 358.5 of this Part, any waiver of the cost of the device granted by the criminal court, and of any intrastate transfer of probation or interstate transfer of any case which either has responsibility to monitor. Such procedure shall also establish a mechanism for advance notification as to date of release where local or State imprisonment is imposed; and
(7)establish a procedure governing failure report recipients, including method and timeframe with respect to specific notification and circumstances. At a minimum the procedure shall be consistent with the provisions of section 358.7(d) of this Part with respect to applicable criminal court and district attorney notification of specific failed tasks and failed tests reports.