Expedited treatment where injunctive relief imposed
Compiled text through Jan 31, 2026
Register checked through Jul 29, 2026
No later Register activity identified in this check.
Dates and status
- Compiling agency
- Department of Civil Service
- Text status
- Source receipt
- Compiled text through
- Jan 31, 2026
- Register checked through
- July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
- Activity status
- No later Register activity identified in this check.
- Source snapshot
- Jun 6, 2026
Notwithstanding the time limits stated in sections 204.2 and 204.3 of this Part, when injunctive relief is imposed by a court pursuant to section 209-a.4 of the act, after affording the parties an opportunity for consultation, the administrative law judge assigned to the proceeding shall issue a scheduling order or orders setting the dates and times for service and filing of answers, responsive pleadings, motions, responses, briefs, and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and for conduct of a pre-hearing conference and hearing. Unless the parties mutually agree to waive the time limit for conducting the hearing and issuing a decision pursuant to section 209-a.4(d) of the act, scheduling orders shall be fashioned in such a manner as to permit the administrative law judge to issue a decision on the improper practice charge within 60 days after the imposition of injunctive relief in accordance with section 209-a.4(d) of the act.