Gross disparities between post-disruption and pre-disruption price
Compiled text through Jan 28, 2026
Register checked through Jul 29, 2026
No later Register activity identified in this check.
Dates and status
- Compiling agency
- Department of Law
- Text status
- Register official extract
- Compiled text through
- Jan 28, 2026
- Register checked through
- July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
- Activity status
- No later Register activity identified in this check.
- Latest notice
- LAW-06-25-00010-A · Adopted rule · Jan 28, 2026
- Source snapshot
- Jun 24, 2026
Section 600.7. Gross Disparities Between Post-Disruption and Pre- Disruption Price. (a) Gross Disparities in Price from Pre-Disruption Price. During a disruption, the sale of an essential product at a price that is greater than 10% of that essential product's pre-disruption price represents a gross disparity in price for purposes of General Business Law § 396-r(3)(b)(i). (b) Effect of Gross Disparity Threshold on Rebuttal Pursuant to Gen- eral Business Law § 396-r(3)(c). If a gross disparity in price is established pursuant to subdivision (a) of this rule for a scrutinized sale, the seller may rebut the prima facie case with evidence, as provided in 13 N.Y.C.R.R. § 600.9, that the amount of increase in the price of the scrutinized sale necessary to preserve the margin of profit that the defendant seller received for the same essential product, or to recover additional costs not within the control of the seller imposed on the seller for the essential product, is an amount sufficient to cause the remaining disparity between the price of the scrutinized sale and the pre-disruption price to be less than 10%.