New York regulations

Title 9 Part 2040

Executive Department

Browse New York regulations by title, part, and section.

11 sections4 source-only entries

Compiled text through Sep 15, 2021Register checked through July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)

All 11 displayed sections in this Part carry the same compiled date. Status and warnings stay on each section.

9 NYCRR 2040.1 - Purpose and background

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source receipt
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026

The Tax Reform Act of 1986, as amended, (the "act") establishes a Federal tax credit (“low- income housing credit,” “LIHTC” or "credit") administered by state housing agencies for owners of housing for persons of low-income. The act authorizes the governor of each state to allocate the low-income housing credit ceiling among governmental units and other issuing authorities in the state. The act requires that the allocation of credit to owners of low-income housing be coordinated by a single state housing credit agency. The act further requires each agency allocating credits to adopt a qualified allocation plan (the “plan” or the “QAP”) which sets forth the criteria and preferences by which credit will be allocated to projects. By Executive Order, the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal has been designated as the State Housing Credit Agency to allocate the credit in a manner which maximizes the public benefit by addressing the State's need for low-income housing and community revitalization incentives. In order to provide for the effective coordination of the State's low-income housing credit program with section 42 of the United States Internal Revenue Code (the "code"), this plan shall be construed and administered in a manner consistent with the code and regulations promulgated thereunder.

9 NYCRR 2040.2 - Definitions

Register change activity found - source update pending

LawEngine holds a witnessed source copy, but later State Register activity targets this section. Inline text is withheld until the change record and source text are reconciled.

Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source-only entry
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026

9 NYCRR 2040.3 - DHCR allocation process

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Westlaw Inline Boundary Correction
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026
(a)Funding rounds.

The division will publish at least annually in the State Register a notice of credit availability which informs applicants of submission dates and deadlines for future funding rounds.

(b)Documentation.

Applicants requesting an allocation of credit must submit an application in a form approved by DHCR. The division may request any and all information it deems necessary for project evaluation. If any submission or documentation is insufficient to complete any evaluation of the proposed project, processing will be terminated. DHCR will not request or accept updated information related to incomplete or insufficient exhibits or attachments used primarily for rating an application.

(c)Processing fees.

The division shall charge an application fee of $3,000, due at the time of application. The division shall charge a fee of $1,000 if a binding agreement is requested. A credit allocation fee of eight percent of the first year credit allocation amount is due at the time of request for the issuance of carryover allocation. Non-profit applicants (or their wholly-owned subsidiaries) which will be the sole general partner or partners of the partnership/project owner or sole managing member or members of the limited liability company/project owner may request and be approved to defer payment of processing fees until the time of carryover allocation.

(d)Credit allocation process.

Only applications submitted by a published deadline will be evaluated for an allocation. Applications will be reviewed for completeness, eligibility, scoring, project feasibility, site suitability, consistency with the division’s underwriting standards and whether a proposed project advances the State’s housing goals and objectives, including any goals set forth by the Regional Economic Development Council strategic plan applicable to the area in which the project is located. The division expects to notify applicants within 150 days from the application deadline on allocation decisions. The process the division employs for allocating credit entails the following:

(1)Credit reservation or binding agreement. The division will determine, in its sole discretion, whether to provide the applicant with a credit reservation or binding agreement based upon the readiness of the project and the availability of credit.
(i)Credit reservations will contain deadlines for: closing on construction financing in an amount sufficient to complete the project; attainment of commitments for permanent financing in an amount sufficient to complete the project; construction start; the project owner to incur more than 10 percent of the reasonably expected basis in the project; and submission of documents necessary for the issuance of an allocation of credit.
(ii)Applicants, after meeting the conditions of the credit reservation, may request a binding agreement if the applicant has obtained commitments from all sources of construction and permanent financing and has obtained all necessary local approvals. Generally, a binding agreement will be issued to an applicant qualifying for a credit reservation to facilitate a project's attainment of construction and/or permanent financing.
(iii)If the applicant does not comply with the deadlines contained in the credit reservation or binding agreement, the division may revoke the reservation or binding agreement and require the applicant to re-apply for credits.
(2)Carryover allocation. Carryover allocations issued by the division will contain any special conditions and specific performance standards. A carryover allocation will be issued if the division determines that an applicant has met the requirements contained in the credit reservation and has submitted the proper certification that more than 10 percent of the reasonably expected basis in the project has been incurred by the project owner. In making a determination to issue a carryover allocation the division will consider the project's status with respect to environmental assessments, local reviews and financial commitments. The issuance of a carryover allocation by the division shall not impose upon the applicant more restrictive performance deadlines than those specified in the credit reservation.
(3)Final credit allocation. All projects which receive credit reservation, binding agreement or carryover allocation from the division, enter service and submit necessary documentation will be evaluated for the final time prior to the final credit allocation. The division may request additional information/documents to complete the evaluation of the project. Prior to the final credit allocation, the owner and the division shall execute a regulatory agreement.
(4)Waiting list. Any complete application which meets the threshold eligibility review criteria but is not selected for a credit reservation will be placed on a waiting list which will be in effect until the next funding round, at which time the waiting list will be terminated. Applicants on the waiting list will remain eligible to be selected for a credit reservation if credits are made available to the division from a national credit pool, expired credit reservation or binding agreement, or recaptured credits.
(5)Other notifications. If an application is found to be incomplete, ineligible, or not feasible the applicant will be notified and no further action will be taken on the application. At any stage in the credit allocation process, the applicant must notify DHCR immediately of any proposed material changes to the project including but not limited to, changes in the project scope, ownership structure, development team, financing, budget, design features, and changes affecting threshold eligibility review criteria and scoring and ranking criteria, tenant population, household income levels served and any other significant factors. All proposed material changes are subject to DHCR’s approval.
(e)Threshold eligibility review criteria.

At each stage of processing (i.e., application, reservation, binding agreement or allocation) applications will be subject to a threshold eligibility review, which will include, but not necessarily be limited to, whether the project meets the following minimum requirements as well as requirements described in a notice of credit availability, request for proposals, design requirements manual, capital programs manual or other manual or document issued by the division:

(1)The project meets the occupancy, rent restrictions and any other requirements of the code.
(2)The project applicant has site control, consistent with the code, for the project real estate through a lease, option, purchase contract or deed.
(3)At the time of application, the project applicant has identified all required governmental approvals necessary to construct and operate the project. At each subsequent stage of processing, the applicant must secure all required governmental approvals to construct and operate the project.
(4)The project applicant must comply with the code regarding notification of the chief executive officer (or the equivalent) of the local jurisdiction within which the proposed project is located and provides such individual a reasonable opportunity to comment on the project.
(5)The project developer, owner and/or manager have successfully developed and operated projects comparable to the proposed project and have the capacity and experience to undertake, complete and operate the proposed project.
(6)The project developer, owner and/or manager and their principals do not include anyone who owns or manages an existing project for which an IRS form 8823 has been issued and has not been corrected or otherwise resolved as determined by the supervising agency.
(7)The project developer, owner and/or manager and their principals do not include anyone who has participated in a publicly assisted program or project that has been determined to be out of compliance with statutes, rules, regulations, policies or agreements and has not been corrected or otherwise resolved as determined by the public agency responsible for supervising the project. The project developer, owner and/or manager and their principals must inform the division in a timely manner of any notice of non-compliance issued at any time.
(8)The amount of requested annual credit allocation does not exceed either the maximum per project or per unit amounts specified in the notice of credit availability issued by the division. Such amounts will be established based upon the expected availability of credit allocation authority. The applicants may request and the commissioner may grant a waiver of this requirement if the commissioner determines that there is sufficient credit available, the project is in furtherance of the State's housing goals and in the best interests of the citizens of the State of New York. A written explanation shall be available to the general public for any waiver granted pursuant to this paragraph.
(9)The project applicant must provide due diligence reports acceptable to the division including but not limited to an appraisal, if necessary, a physical needs assessment, if necessary, a comprehensive market study (which must be conducted consistent with guidance provided by the division which demonstrates at a minimum that the proposed number and type of units meet an existing and identified need of low-income individuals and can be readily absorbed by existing need in the local area) and a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment which meets current American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards, dated not more than 12 months prior to the application submission deadline.
(10)There will be no adverse impact on the occupancy rates of other publicly-assisted housing in the local area.
(11)The project does not involve the permanent involuntary displacement of existing tenants in order to qualify for credits.
(12)The number of bedrooms in the units in the proposed project are appropriate for the type of occupancy proposed.
(13)All LIHTC-assisted first floor units in new construction projects without an elevator, all LIHTC-assisted units in new construction projects with an elevator, and as many LIHTC-assisted units as feasible in adaptive reuse or rehabilitation projects shall meet visitability standards, except when such standards are demonstrated to be irreconcilable with Federal, State or local statutes, regulations, ordinances or codes.
(14)If the project includes the rehabilitation of any building(s), the acquisition costs of the building(s) must be reasonable as determined by the division and may not exceed 25 percent of the total development costs of the project; unless:
(i)it is a preservation project (as defined at section 2040.2[r] of this Part); or
(ii)the commissioner has determined that the preservation of the building(s) is in the best interest of the State. A written explanation shall be available to the general public for any allocation of a housing credit dollar amount which is made in accordance with this subdivision.
(15)Project construction has not started without prior authorization by the division.
(16)The project will:
(i)be a qualified low-income housing project subject to a regulatory agreement with the division for no less than 30 years, however, the minimum term may be increased as set forth in the annual request for proposals for each funding round; or
(ii)be conveyed pursuant to an effective plan for existing tenants to purchase the project at the end of the compliance period.
(17)The project’s design and construction must comply with green and energy efficiency sustainable building practices and measures appropriate for the type of building proposed as set forth in the annual request for proposals for each funding round. Rehabilitation projects must take into account, among other factors, cost effectiveness based on the scope of reconstruction necessary and the historic nature of the project. All projects must identify how green and energy efficiency sustainable building requirements will be met and agree to provide, prior to construction closing, a certification from a responsible green and/or energy professional that the project will meet such requirements.
(18)The division has completed a credit and background review of the project developer, owner, general contractor and/or manager and their principals with results acceptable to the division.
(19)The project applicant, developer, owner, general contractor, and/or manager and their principals agree not to contract for any services related to the project with any entity on any Federal or New York State debarment lists and include a provision in all contracts related to the project barring the participation of entities on such lists.
(20)The project does not significantly exceed the costs of other proposed projects, unless a determination has been issued by the commissioner finding the project to be in furtherance of the State’s housing goals. A written explanation shall be available to the general public for any allocation of housing credit made pursuant to this paragraph.
(21)The project applicant, developer, owner, general contractor and/or manager and their principals are in compliance with all relevant Federal, New York State, division policies and requirements, and local laws and regulations, including but not limited to the prohibition against discriminating against section 8 housing choice voucher holders, nondiscrimination and marketing policies, guidelines and requirements.
(22)The project applicant, developer, owner and/or manager and their principals does not include anyone who, in the sole judgment of the division, has initiated or been the decision maker in requesting a qualified contract under section 42(h)(6)(F) of the code after the effective date of this QAP.
(f)Project scoring and ranking criteria.

Project applications which pass threshold eligibility review shall be scored and ranked based upon the following criteria as may be further described in a notice of credit availability, request for proposals, design requirements manual, capital programs manual or other manual or document issued by the division.

(1)Community impact/revitalization (maximum of 10 points). Scored on the extent the project provides affordable housing in an area that meets the following criteria:
(i)the project proposes the use or reuse of existing buildings, infill new construction, and/or the demolition and replacement of buildings having a blighting impact on a community and the rehabilitation of which is impracticable and advances a neighborhood specific revitalization plan or is complementary to an ongoing neighborhood specific planning and/or revitalization effort (“a Concerted Community Revitalization Plan”). Plans and/or efforts may be led by local government, locally based community organizations and/or individuals. Plans and/or efforts will be evaluated based on whether they seek to fundamentally improve the quality of life and opportunities for neighborhood residents based on the following criteria:
(a)incorporate easy access to public transportation and/or promote walkable communities in which essential goods and services are accessible within a short and safe walking distance;
(b)are consistent with the historic character and density of the neighborhood;
(c)provide evidence of an ongoing, multi-faceted revitalization effort and/or plan that addresses the homeownership, commercial, service, employment, nutritional, recreational, educational and cultural needs of the neighborhood;
(d)result from an open, public process in which neighborhood residents have had meaningful opportunities to contribute to its development;
(e)identifies existing neighborhood strengths upon which the revitalization plan and/or effort is based, including, but not limited to, access to employment opportunities and proximity to viable commercial districts, stable neighborhoods and cultural institutions;
(f)identifies goals to be met and obstacles to be overcome by the plan; and
(g)promotes mixed-income development (up to 5 points).
(ii)the project clearly advances specific housing objectives of a regional economic development council strategic plan applicable to the area in which the project is located (5 points).
(2)Financial leveraging (up to 11 points). Scored to the extent that other funding sources (not including a deferred developer's fee) finance a portion of the project's total development cost, including but not limited to sources such as:
(i)permanent funding from sources other than the division or HTFC;
(ii)the donation of land and/or building(s);
(iii)the provision of a long term lease at a nominal amount;
(iv)the net syndication proceeds as a proportion of the total credit requested; and/or
(v)the amount of credit requested per unit adjusted for unit size.
(3)Sponsor characteristics (up to 9 points). Scored on the applicant's development and management team experience in the timely development and completion of low-income housing within proposed development budgets and project scope, and the management of such housing within approved operating budgets in a manner consistent with all statutes, regulations and policies.
(4)Green building (up to 5 points). Scored on the extent the project identifies and will comply with a sustainable green building strategy identified in the request for proposals for each funding round.
(5)Fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready units (up to 5 points). Scored on whether the applicant has provided evidence that there is sufficient market demand for the number and type of units proposed and has certified it will enter into a written agreement with an experienced service organization(s) to provide appropriate referrals for fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready units:
(i)at least five percent (rounded up to the next whole number) of the project units are fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready, which includes a roll-in shower with an attached seat or is designed to accommodate a roll-in shower with an attached seat which will be installed at the owners expense upon request, for person(s) who have a mobility impairment and the unit(s) will be marketed to households with at least one member who has a mobility impairment; and at least two percent (rounded up to the next whole number) of the project units are fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready for person(s) who have a hearing or vision impairment and the unit(s) will be marketed to households with at least one member who has a hearing or vision impairment. Fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready units shall be equitably distributed among the various dwelling unit types in the project based upon:
(a)evidence of market demand;
(b)guidance of the service organization providing referrals to the project; and/or
(c)applicable Federal or State law (2 points); or
(ii)the percentages of units meeting the requirements of subparagraph (i) of this paragraph are equal to or exceeded 10 percent and 4 percent (rounded up to the next whole number) respectively (a minimum of two units each). Fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready units shall be equitably distributed among the various dwelling unit types in the project based upon:
(a)evidence of market demand;
(b)guidance of the service organization providing referrals to the project; and/or
(c)applicable Federal or State law (5 points).
(6)Affordability (up to 8 points). Scored on the percentage of LIHTC units in the project which will be affordable and targeted to persons with the lowest incomes (e.g., 30 percent, 40 percent, or 50 percent of area median income) and whether the applicant provides evidence that a public housing authority will make referrals to the proposed project.
(7)Individuals with children (up to 7 points). Scored on the ratio of bedrooms to units in a project serving households with children and whether the project is a housing opportunity project or advances a neighborhood specific revitalization plan and/or effort.
(8)Project readiness (up to 10 points). Scored on the extent the application demonstrates the likelihood of a construction closing in the shortest possible timeframe based upon an assessment of the status of financing commitments and whether the project is supported by the implementation of significant measures including but not limited to infrastructure improvements, real property tax relief and rezoning.
(9)Persons with special needs (5 points). Scored if the project will give preference in tenant selection to persons with special needs, with priority being given to such persons who have served in the armed forces of the United States for a period of at least six months (or any shorter period due to injury incurred in such service) for at least 15 percent of the LIHTC-assisted units and whether the persons with special needs will be provided supportive housing or will be offered supportive services as evidenced by a comprehensive service plan and a written commitment or agreement with a service provider experienced in meeting the specific service needs of persons for which preference is provided.
(10)Participation of non-profit organizations (up to 4 points). Scored on the extent of participation of a non-profit organization or organizations:
(i)whether local non-profit organization(s) or or-profit wholly owned subsidiary(ies):
(a)has fostering of low-income housing as one of its tax-exempt purposes;
(b)is not affiliated, established or controlled by a for-profit entity; and
(c)will serve as sole general partner(s) of the limited partnership/project owner or sole managing member(s) of the limited liability company/project owner (4 points); or
(ii)whether local non-profit organization(s) or for-profit wholly owned subsidiary(ies) with demonstrable housing experience and capability has a defined and substantive role in the development or management of the project through the extended use period (2 points); or
(iii)whether non-profit organization(s) that does not qualify as a local non-profit organization(s) under section 2040.2(m) of this Part, or its for-profit wholly owned subsidiary, has a defined and substantive role in the ownership, development or management of the project through the extended use period (1 point).
(11)Mixed income (up to 4 points). Scored to the extent the project would serve households earning above 60 percent of area median income.
(12)Historic nature of project (up to 2 points). Scored on whether:
(i)the project includes the rehabilitation of a historic building (1 point);
(ii)the applicant demonstrates that the project will include a building that will be eligible for, and the applicant will seek, a Federal tax credit for the rehabilitation of historic buildings (1 point).
(13)Cost effectiveness (5 points). Points will be awarded to individual projects based upon a comparison of project costs to the costs proposed in other project applications.
(14)Housing opportunity projects (up to 5 points). Scored to the extent the project is in close proximity to public transportation, is located in a community with a low incidence of crime, and/or is located in an area of opportunity as set forth in a request for proposals issued by the division.
(15)Investment in underserved areas (5 points). Scored on whether there is limited or no subsidized affordable housing production and an unmet demand for affordable housing in the past 10 years within the primary market area of the proposed location of the project.
(16)Minority- and women-owned business enterprise and service-disabled veteran-owned business participation (up to 5 points). Scored to the extent the project development team includes New York State certified minority- and/or women-owned businesses and service-disabled veteran-owned businesses.
(g)Determination of the amount for credit allocation.
(1)
(i)Evaluation of project. All projects considered for an allocation of credit shall be evaluated pursuant to the code at the following times: at application; at allocation; and after the building is placed in service. The division will consider the project ranking, analyze operating economics, financing and development cost for reasonableness and determine the amount of credit necessary for the financial feasibility of the project and its viability as a qualified low-income housing project. The division will require that the operating economics of the project be fiscally sound and in compliance with LIHTC regulatory requirements; and, that all project costs, including developer's fee, are necessary and reasonable based upon the project size, project characteristics, location and risk factors. Capitalized operating reserves shall be limited to real estate operations and may not be used to fund social services. The sources of all proposed financing for the project will be reviewed to ensure that the assistance proposed for the project does not exceed that amount necessary for project feasibility.
(ii)Preference in allocation of credit dollar amounts. Among the projects selected for a credit allocation, the code mandates that preference in the dollar amount of the credit allocation will be given to projects which:
(a)serve the lowest income tenants;
(b)are obligated to serve qualified tenants for the longest periods; and
(c)are located in a qualified census tract and their development contributes to a concerted community revitalization plan.

These evaluations will be based upon the project's specific economic needs subject only to statutory limitations.

(2)Cost standards. If HUD assistance is proposed for the project, DHCR will apply HUD subsidy review layering guidelines. Otherwise the division shall apply the following standards when calculating the maximum amount of the credit necessary for the project:
(i)Construction related items (costs). The maximum allowable construction related costs shall be, in relation to the contractor's contract: builder's profit of 6 percent; builder's overhead of 2 percent; and general conditions of 6 percent, or any combination of these costs totaling no more than 14 percent, based upon actual and reasonable construction costs.
(ii)Developer's fee. The amount of developer fee compensation for services, overhead, and profit recognized in the adjusted project cost shall be 10 percent of the acquisition and improvement cost associated with the low-income portions of the project. This can be increased up to a ceiling of 15 percent of improvement cost of the low-income portion where either the developer or its affiliate provides to the satisfaction of the division both a cost completion guarantee and an operating deficit guarantee as those guarantees are set forth in the project owner's organizational documents. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Part, the amount of the developer's fee for a high acquisition cost project shall be based upon the division's assessment of risk assumed by the project owner, considering factors including, but not limited to, rent subsidies or other project operating support, location, financing sources, occupancy level, project type, and identity of interest.
(iii)Identity of interest. The division may reduce any allowable costs, including but not limited to the developer's fee, where an identity of interest has been found among the parties to the transactions involving the acquisition, syndication, financing, development, construction and/or operation of the project, if it is determined that such costs exceed reasonable amounts. At the time of application, all applicants will be required to submit an affidavit disclosing the nature of any identity of interest. Where there exists such an identity of interest, the applicant will be required to demonstrate expenditures to be customary given the financial structure of the project. At the time of carryover allocation and at the time of the submission to the agency of the request for IRS Form 8609, the applicant must disclose any additional identities of interest among the parties to transactions involving the syndication, financing, development, construction and/or operation of the project.
(3)Syndication standards. The division will require that the value received on sale of the credit from projects receiving an allocation from the division be valued at market rates or greater. The amount of equity capital contributed by investors to a project partnership shall not be less than the amount generally contributed by investors to similar projects as determined by using sales of comparable credit projects and the division's evaluation of market trends. The division will base all calculations of the minimum net syndication proceeds available to the project on the assumption that 99.9 percent of the project has been sold to investors.
(4)Calculation of credit amount. The credit amount for a project shall be the lesser of the eligible allocation or the gap amount.
(i)Eligible allocation. The eligible allocation is the maximum amount the project is eligible for under the code. It is determined by multiplying the qualified basis of the project by the applicable credit percentage.
(ii)Gap amount. The gap amount is determined by subtracting the amount of supportable debt and other associated financing from the adjusted project cost and then dividing this financing gap by a factor based upon either the market or syndication pricing proposed for the project, whichever is higher.
(5)General. The division reserves the right to allocate credit in a manner which affirmatively advances fair housing, yields an equitable distribution of credit throughout the State, to ensure the participation of qualified non-profit organizations, to implement such special priorities or demonstration programs contained in the notice of credit availability or request for proposals and to advance coordinated investments by State, Federal, and local governmental partners. The division also reserves the right to assign scoring points as set forth in subdivision (f) of this section to the extent a project addresses the division’s underwriting and design standards, as set forth in a request for proposals. Any special priorities or demonstration programs shall be consistent with the priorities and selection criteria set forth herein and shall be described in detail in the notice of credit availability and request for proposals. Notwithstanding the scoring system set forth above, DHCR reserves the right to deny any request for an allocation of credit irrespective of its point ranking if such request is inconsistent with the State's housing goals including the housing objectives of a Regional Economic Development Council applicable to the area in which the project is located and shall have the power to allocate credits to a project irrespective of its point ranking, if such intended allocation is: in compliance with the code; in furtherance of the State's housing goals including the housing objectives of a Regional Economic Development Council applicable to the area in which the project is located; and determined by the commissioner to be in the interests of the citizens of the State of New York. A written explanation shall be available to the general public for any allocation of a housing credit dollar amount which is not made in accordance with established priorities and the selection criteria set forth herein.
(6)Set-asides. For the purpose of implementing the State’s housing goals, including the housing objectives of the Regional Economic Development Council applicable to the area in which the project is located, the division reserves the right to set aside credit, including, but not limited to, set-asides for housing opportunity projects, preservation projects and supportive housing projects.

9 NYCRR 2040.4 - Projects financed by private activity bonds

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source receipt
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026
(a)Eligible projects.

After March 1, 2008, applications for LIHTC from projects financed by tax-exempt bonds subject to the private activity bond volume cap in accordance with section 42(h)(4)(A) of the code will be processed by the New York State Housing Finance Agency under its procedures. This section shall apply to applications filed with DHCR pursuant to section 42(h)(4)(A) of the code. All other provisions of this Part shall remain in full force and effect for applications filed pursuant to this section prior to March 1, 2008. Projects financed by tax-exempt bonds subject to the private activity bond volume cap in accordance with section 42(h)(4)(A) of the code may be allocated low-income housing credit which is not taken into account regarding the State housing credit ceiling.

(b)Application process.

Complete applications must be submitted at 60 days prior to the proposed construction start date on a form approved by DHCR and will be accepted and processed throughout the calendar year. The division may request any and all information it deems necessary for project evaluation. If any submission is incomplete or if documentation is insufficient to complete any evaluation of the proposed project, processing will be suspended. Complete applications will be reviewed relative to criteria contained in section 2040.3(e) and (f) of this Part for eligibility and public purpose. Within 60 days after receipt of a complete application the division will issue to the applicant a finding as to whether the application is consistent with this qualified allocation plan and the amount of LIHTC for which the project qualifies pursuant to section 2040.3(g) of this Part. If the application is consistent with this qualified allocation plan, the applicant will receive processing instructions for a final allocation of credit. If the project is found to be inconsistent with the division's qualified allocation plan the owner will be notified of the reasons.

(c)Processing fees.

The division shall charge an application fee of $2,000, due at the time of application. A credit allocation fee of three percent of the first year credit allocation amount is due at the time of request for the issuance of final credit allocation. Not-for-profit applicants (or their wholly-owned subsidiaries) which will be the sole general partner of the partnership/project owner or sole managing member of the limited liability company/project owner may request and be approved to defer payment of the application fee until the time of issuance of the final credit allocation.

(d)Determination of credit amount.

In accordance with code section 42(m)(2)(D) the issuer of the tax exempt bonds is responsible for determining the dollar amount of credit which is necessary for the financial feasibility of the project and its viability as a qualified low-income housing project throughout the credit period. Such determination must be included in the applicant's request to the division for a final allocation of credit. The division will process requests for a final allocation of credit within 60 days from receipt of all required documentation including an executed credit regulatory agreement with proof of recording. The division will apply the criteria as set forth in section 2040.3(g) of this Part (except for section 2040.3[g][1][ii] of this Part) in determining the amount for the final credit allocation.

(e)Regulatory term.

The regulatory requirements of projects receiving an allocation under the terms of this section is described in section 2040.5 of this Part and shall be subject to compliance monitoring as described in section 2040.7 of this Part.

9 NYCRR 2040.5 - Regulatory agreement

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source receipt
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026
(a)Restrictive covenant.

The division shall require the owners of projects which receive a credit allocation after 1989 to execute a regulatory agreement. The regulatory agreement must be recorded as a restrictive covenant which runs with the land and returned to the division after recording (prior to the issuance of the final credit allocation). The regulatory agreement shall be made available for public inspection at the rental office of the owner and referenced in all marketing materials and a copy, or a division approved summary thereof, attached to the lease of each low-income unit.

(b)Other provisions.

The regulatory agreement shall specify, for the low-income portion of the building(s) that: the agreement shall be binding on all successors of the owner; the owner agrees to be bound by any regulations duly promulgated by the division or the Federal government for projects receiving low-income housing credits; the owner shall disclose the restricted rent for a dwelling unit to the prospective tenant prior to the execution of a lease; the owner shall secure from the tenant such information as is reasonably necessary to annually verify income; the owner shall address any citations for building code violations made by a municipality within 90 days of receipt; the owner shall ensure that the applicable fraction, as defined in the code, for the building for each taxable year in the extended use period will not be less than the applicable fraction specified therein; the owner shall consent to enforcement in any State court of the extended use requirement by any income eligible person; the owner shall annually submit a certification to DHCR stating that the building(s) is (are) owned and operated in compliance with the provisions of the code and any regulations promulgated thereunder, and provide such other information as the division may deem necessary; and the owner shall not retaliate against any tenant who notifies the division of alleged violations of the regulatory agreement. The extended use agreement shall include an agreement to waive any right to request a qualified contract and provide that the extended use period will not be subject to early termination pursuant to the qualified contract provisions as defined in section 42(h)(6)(F) of the code. The extended use agreement shall contain a provision which states that the agreement shall not be terminated if ownership is transferred by foreclosure or by a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure as a result of any action to collect debt which is owed to any entity which at any time after the issuance of a final credit allocation had any ownership interest in the project.

(c)Request for a qualified contract.

This section only applies to projects in which the project owner has a regulatory agreement executed by the division which specifically grants the right to request a qualified contract. The owner may request only in writing, by certified mail to DHCR to the attention of the LIHTC monitoring officer, that DHCR produce a qualified contract from a buyer who will continue to operate the building(s) for low-income use. A request for a qualified contract shall be an irrevocable offer to sell during the applicable one-year period. If DHCR presents a qualified contract during the above one-year period, such qualified contract shall confer upon the buyer an exclusive right to purchase the project. For the purpose of determining the value of a qualified contract, “cash distributions from (or available for distribution from) the project” as set forth in the code shall include management incentive fees paid or due to anyone who at any time after the issuance of a final credit allocation had any ownership interest in the project. DHCR will specify the checklist of items required to be submitted as part of a request for a qualified contract. A nonrefundable fee, in an amount determined by DHCR, is due upon submission of a request for a qualified contract. The owner shall be required to pay for any services reasonably determined by DHCR to be necessary for the technical review of a request for a qualified contract by an accountant, appraiser or other relevant expert.

(d)All projects shall at all times maintain adequate records concerning vacancies. These records should be updated at least monthly and, upon DHCR’s request, provided to DHCR in order to maintain the State’s ability to quickly respond to natural disasters and other emergencies.

9 NYCRR 2040.6 - Miscellaneous issues

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source receipt
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026
(a)Information requests.

Requests for information made under the Freedom of Information Law, must be in writing, and may be mailed to DHCR's Office of Legal Affairs, 38-40 State Street, Albany, NY 12207, or e-mailed to [email protected]

(b)Changes in ownership.

Any and all changes in the ownership interests or principals of any project (prior to issuance of final credit allocation) for which an application has been submitted to DHCR, will be subject to written confirmation by DHCR that DHCR has no objection to the change(s) proposed. DHCR reserves the right to disallow any application where there have been changes in the ownership interests or principals.

9 NYCRR 2040.7 - Monitoring and administration

Register change activity found - source update pending

LawEngine holds a witnessed source copy, but later State Register activity targets this section. Inline text is withheld until the change record and source text are reconciled.

Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source-only entry
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026

9 NYCRR 2040.8 - Annual certification

Register change activity found - source update pending

LawEngine holds a witnessed source copy, but later State Register activity targets this section. Inline text is withheld until the change record and source text are reconciled.

Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source-only entry
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026

9 NYCRR 2040.9 - Compliance and inspection

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source receipt
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026
(a)For all buildings placed in service on or after January 1, 2001, the division shall conduct on-site inspections of all buildings in the project by the end of the second calendar year following the year the last building in the project is placed in service and, for at least 20 percent of the projects's low-income units, inspect the units for habitability and review the low-income certifications, the documentation supporting the certifications, and the rent records for the tenants in those units.
(b)At least once every three years, the agency shall conduct on-site inspections of all buildings in the project and, for at least 20 percent of the project's low-income units, inspect the units for habitability and review the low-income certifications, the documentation supporting the certifications, and the rent records for the tenants in those units.
(c)The agency shall randomly select which low-income units and tenant records are to be inspected and reviewed by the agency. The review of tenant records may be undertaken wherever the owner maintains or stores the records (either on-site or off-site). The units and tenant records to be inspected and reviewed shall be chosen in a manner that will not give owners of low-income housing projects advance notice that a unit and tenant records for a particular year will or will not be inspected and reviewed. DHCR may give an owner reasonable notice that an inspection of the building and low-income units or tenant record review will occur so that the owner may notify tenants of the inspection or assemble tenant records for review.
(d)The division shall review any local health, safety, or building code violations, reports or notices retained by the owner and must determine whether the buildings and units satisfy, as determined by the agency, the uniform physical condition standards for public housing established by HUD (24 CFR 5.703). The HUD physical condition standards do not supersede or preempt local health, safety, and building codes. A low-income housing project under section 42 must continue to satisfy these codes and, if the agency becomes aware of any violation of these codes, the agency must report the violation to the IRS. However, provided the agency determines by inspection that the HUD standards are met, the agency is not required to determine by inspection whether the project meets local health, safety, and building codes.
(e)Exception from inspection provision.

The division shall not be required to inspect a building under subdivision (d) of this section if the building is financed by the Rural Housing Service (RHS) under the section 515 program, the RHS inspects the building (under 7 CFR part 1930), and the RHS and DHCR enter into a memorandum of understanding, or other similar arrangement, under which the RHS agrees to notify the agency of the inspection results.

(f)An inspection may include, but is not limited to: a physical inspection of the building, grounds, individual rental units, common facilities and central systems for general construction; a review of all records described above; interviews of tenants and project employees; and any other information which the division deems relevant.

9 NYCRR 2040.10 - Notification of noncompliance

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source receipt
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026

In addition to any other remedies which may be available, in accordance with the requirements of the code, the division shall notify project owners and the IRS of noncompliance with any of the above requirements or failure to submit any owner certification required by this plan as follows:

(a)The division shall provide prompt written notice to the owner of a low-income housing project if the division does not receive the certification described in section 2040.8 of this Part or does not receive, or is not permitted to inspect, the tenant income certifications, supporting documentation, and rent records described in section 2040.7 of this Part, or discovers upon inspection, review, or in some other manner, that the project is not in compliance with the provisions of the code.
(b)The division shall file a “Low-Income Housing Credit Agencies Report of Noncompliance or Building Disposition,” (the “form”), and/or provide such other notification as required by the code, with the IRS no later than 45 days after the end of the correction period (as described in subdivision [c] of this section, including such extensions of time granted by the division for correction) and no earlier than the end of the correction period, whether or not the noncompliance or failure to certify is corrected; and shall explain on the form the nature of the noncompliance or failure to certify and indicate whether the owner has corrected the noncompliance or failure to certify. Any change in either the eligible basis or applicable fraction under section 2040.8(b)(2)(vii) and (viii) of this Part respectively, that results in a decrease in the qualified basis of the project under code section 42(c)(1) is noncompliance that must be reported to the IRS. If the division reports on the form that a building is entirely out of compliance and will not be in compliance at any time in the future, the division need not file the form in subsequent years to report that building's noncompliance. (The division shall file the form with the IRS to report a sale of a project and/or building for which the low-income housing credit is, or has been allowable at any time.) If the noncompliance or failure to certify is corrected within three years after the end of a correction period, the division shall file the form with the IRS reporting the correction of the noncompliance or failure to certify.
(c)The division shall provide the owner a correction period in which to cure a failure to certify or event(s) of noncompliance. The correction period shall not exceed 90 days from the date the division sends a notification of noncompliance. The division may extend the correction period for up to six months if, in its sole discretion, the division determines there is good cause for granting the extension.

9 NYCRR 2040.11 - Agency retention of records

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source receipt
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026

The division shall retain records of noncompliance or failure to certify for six years beyond the agency's filing of the respective IRS form 8823. In other cases the division must retain the certifications and records described in sections 2040.7 and 2040.8 of this Part for three years from the end of the calendar year the division receives the certified records.

9 NYCRR 2040.12 - Delegation of authority

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source receipt
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026

The division, at its discretion, may delegate its monitoring functions to another State housing credit agency or retain an agent or other private contractor to perform monitoring to the extent delegation of the division's monitoring activities is permitted by law.

9 NYCRR 2040.13 - Liability

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source receipt
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026

Compliance with the requirements of the code is the sole responsibility of the owner of the building for which the credit is allowable. DHCR's obligation to monitor for compliance with the requirements of the code does not impose liability on DHCR for an owner's noncompliance.

9 NYCRR 2040.14 - New York State low-income Housing Tax Credit Program

Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.

Top
Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Westlaw Inline Boundary Correction
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026
(a)Purpose and background.

Article 2-A of the Public Housing Law (the law), established a State tax credit to be administered by DHCR for owners of housing for persons of low-income. The law authorizes the commissioner to allocate the State low-income housing tax credit (SLIHC) to eligible buildings in the State. The law provides that the SLIHC program be administered in the same manner as the Federal Low-Income Housing Credit Program (LIHTC) authorized by section 42 of the code and administered by the commissioner pursuant to this Part and authorizes the commissioner to promulgate rules and regulations necessary to administer the provisions of the law. All determinations by the commissioner regarding eligibility shall be final. All the processes and procedures applicable to the LIHTC Program shall apply to the SLIHC Program except as modified below.

(b)Additional definitions.
(1)Eligibility statement shall mean a statement issued by the commissioner certifying that a building that has been placed in service is an eligible low- income building with a certain amount of SLIHC allowable. For purposes of SLIHC, all references to the IRS form 8609 shall be deemed to be references to an eligibility statement for the SLIHC.
(2)Eligible low-income building shall mean any building located in New York which either is a qualified low-income building as defined in section 42 of the code, or would be a qualified low-income building under such section if the 20-50 test specified in section 42(g)(1) of the code were disregarded and the 40-60 test specified in such section (requiring that at least 40 percent of the residential units be both rent-restricted and occupied by individuals whose income is 60 percent or less of area median gross income) were a 40-90 test.
(3)Qualified basis of an eligible low-income building shall mean the qualified basis of such building as determined under section 42 of the code or which would be determined under such section if the 40-90 test specified above applied under such section 42 to determine if such building were part of a qualified low-income housing project.
(4)De minimis determination. The Commissioner of Taxation and Finance in consultation with the commissioner may exempt from recapture any SLIHC which are allocated to a project or unit which is otherwise eligible but is not an eligible low-income building due to an error by the owner in calculating the low-income eligibility test.
(5)Notice of noncompliance shall mean a statement issued by the commissioner and sent to the project owner notifying the project owner that the project is not in compliance with the provisions of this section. For the purposes of SLIHC, all references to IRS form 8823 shall be deemed references to the notice of noncompliance.
(c)Funding rounds.

A notice of credit availability will be issued annually by the DHCR following enactment of statute providing credit allocation authority. Such notice shall remain in effect until such time as the SLIHC credit allocation authority is expended or expired.

(d)Project scoring and ranking criteria.

Project applications which pass threshold eligibility review shall be scored and ranked based upon the following criteria as may be further described in a notice of credit availability, request for proposals, design requirements manual, capital programs manual or other manual or document issued by the division.

(1)Community impact/revitalization (maximum of 10 points). Scored on the extent the project provides affordable housing in an area that meets the following criteria:
(i)the project proposes the use or reuse of existing buildings, infill new construction, and/or the demolition and replacement of buildings having a blighting impact on a community and the rehabilitation of which is impracticable and advances a neighborhood specific revitalization plan or is complementary to an ongoing neighborhood specific planning and/or revitalization effort (“a Concerted Community Revitalization Plan”). Plans and/or efforts may be led by local government, locally based community organizations and/or individuals. Plans and/or efforts will be evaluated based on whether they seek to fundamentally improve the quality of life and opportunities for neighborhood residents based on the following criteria:
(a)incorporate easy access to public transportation and/or promote walkable communities in which essential goods and services are accessible within a short and safe walking distance;
(b)are consistent with the historic character and density of the neighborhood;
(c)provide evidence of an ongoing, multi-faceted revitalization effort and/or plan that addresses the homeownership, commercial, service, employment, nutritional, recreational, educational and cultural needs of the neighborhood;
(d)result from an open, public process in which neighborhood residents have had meaningful opportunities to contribute to its development;
(e)identifies existing neighborhood strengths upon which the revitalization plan or effort is based, including, but not limited to, access to employment opportunities and proximity to viable commercial districts, stable neighborhoods and cultural institutions;
(f)identifies goals to be met and obstacles to be overcome by the plan; and
(g)promotes mixed-income development (up to 5 points).
(ii)the project clearly advances specific housing objectives of a regional economic development council strategic plan applicable to the area in which the project will be located (5 points).
(2)Financial leveraging (up to 11 points). Scored to the extent that other funding sources (not including a deferred developer's fee) finance a portion of the project's total development cost, including but not limited to sources such as:
(i)permanent funding from sources other than the division or HTFC;
(ii)the donation of land and/or building(s);
(iii)the provision of a long term lease at a nominal amount;
(iv)the net syndication proceeds as a proportion of the total credit requested; and/or
(v)the amount of credit requested per unit adjusted for unit size.
(3)Sponsor characteristics (up to 9 points). Scored on the applicant's development and management team experience in the timely development and completion of low-income housing within approved proposed development budgets, and project scope, and the management of such housing within approved operating budgets in a manner consistent with all statutes, regulations and policies.
(4)Green building (up to 5 points). Scored on the extent the project identifies and will comply with a sustainable green building strategy identified in the request for proposals for each funding round.
(5)Income mixture (up to 12 points). Scored on the extent affordable housing opportunities are provided to different income levels (i.e., above 90 percent of area median income, 60 percent to 50 percent of area median income, 50 percent to 30 percent of area median income, below 30 percent of area median income) in addition to the units available to households between 60 percent and 90 percent of area median income and whether the applicant provides evidence that a public housing authority will make referrals to the proposed project.
(6)Fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready units (up to 5 points). Scored on whether the applicant has provided evidence that there is sufficient market demand for the number and type of units proposed and has certified it will enter into a written agreement with an experienced service organization(s) to provide appropriate referrals for fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready units:
(i)at least five percent (rounded up to the next whole number) of the project units are fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready, which includes a roll-in shower with an attached seat or is designed to accommodate a roll-in shower with an attached seat which will be installed at the owner’s expense upon request, for person(s) who have a mobility impairment and the unit(s) will be marketed to households with at least one member who has a mobility impairment; and at least two percent (rounded up to the next whole number) of the project units are fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready for person(s) who have a hearing or vision impairment and the unit(s) will be marketed to households with at least one member who has a hearing or vision impairment. Fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready units shall be equitably distributed among the various dwelling unit types in the project based upon:
(a)evidence of market demand;
(b)guidance of the service organization providing referrals to the project; and/or
(c)applicable Federal or State law (2 points).
(ii)the percentages of units meeting the requirements of subparagraph (i) of this paragraph are equal to or exceed 10 percent and 4 percent (rounded up to the next whole number) respectively (a minimum of two units each). Fully accessible and adapted, move-in ready units shall be equitably distributed among the various dwelling unit types in the project based upon:
(a)evidence of market demand;
(b)guidance of the service organization providing referrals to the project; and/or
(c)applicable Federal or State law (5 points).
(7)Project readiness (up to 10 points). Scored on the extent the application demonstrates the likelihood of a construction closing in the shortest possible timeframe based upon an assessment of the status of financing commitments, applicable environmental approvals or clearances and whether the project is supported by the implementation of significant measures including, but not limited to, infrastructure improvements, real property tax relief and rezoning.
(8)Persons with special needs (5 points). Scored if the project will give preference in tenant selection to persons with special needs, with priority being given to such persons who have served in the armed forces of the United States for a period of at least six months (or any shorter period due to injury incurred in such service), for at least 15 percent of the DHCR-assisted units and whether the persons with special needs will be provided supportive housing or will be offered supportive services as evidenced by a comprehensive service plan and a written commitment or agreement with a service provider experienced in meeting the specific service needs of persons for which preference is provided.
(9)Individuals with children (up to 7 points). Scored on the ratio of bedrooms to units in a project serving households with children and whether the project is a housing opportunity project or advances a neighborhood specific revitalization plan and/or effort.
(10)Participation of non-profit organizations (up to 4 points). Scored on the extent of participation of a non-profit organization or organizations:
(i)whether local non-profit organization or its for-profit wholly owned subsidiary(ies):
(a)has fostering of low-income housing as one of its tax-exempt purposes;
(b)is not affiliated, established or controlled by a for-profit entity; and
(c)will serve as sole general partner of the limited partnership/project owner or sole managing member of the limited liability company/project owner (4 points); or
(ii)whether local non-profit organization(s) or for-profit wholly owned subsidiary(ies), with demonstrable housing experience and capability, has a defined and substantive role in the ownership, development and management of the project through the extended use period (2 points); or
(iii)whether non-profit organization(s) that does not qualify as a local non-profit organization(s) under section 2040.2(m) of this Part, or its for-profit wholly owned subsidiary(ies), has a defined and substantive role in the ownership, development or management of the project through the extended use period (1 point).
(11)Historic nature of project (up to 2 points). Scored on whether:
(i)the project includes the rehabilitation of a historic building (1 point);
(ii)the applicant demonstrates that the project will include a building that will be eligible for, and the applicant will seek, a Federal tax credit for the rehabilitation of historic buildings (1 point).
(12)Cost effectiveness (5 points). Points will be awarded to individual projects based upon a comparison of project costs to the costs proposed in other project applications.
(13)Housing opportunity (up to 5 points). Scored to the extent the project is in close proximity to public transportation, is located in a community with a low incidence of crime, and/or is located in an area of opportunity as set forth in a request for proposals issued by the division.
(14)Investment in underserved areas (5 points). Scored on whether there is limited or no subsidized affordable housing production and an unmet demand for affordable housing in the past 10 years within the primary market area of the proposed location of the project.
(15)Minority and women owned business enterprise and service-disabled veteran-owned business participation (up to 5 points). Scored to the extent the project development team includes NYS certified minority and/or women-owned and service-disabled veteran-owned businesses.
(e)Determination of the amount for SLIHC allocation.

DHCR shall determine the dollar amount of the SLIHC to be allocated to a project in the same manner as when determining the dollar amount of a LIHTC allocation.

(f)General.

The division reserves the right to allocate SLIHC in a manner which affirmatively advances fair housing, yields an equitable distribution of SLIHC throughout the State, to ensure the participation of qualified non-profit organizations, to implement such special priorities or demonstration programs contained in the notice of credit availability or request for proposals and to advance coordinated investments by State, Federal and local government partners. The division also reserves the right to assign scoring points as set forth in section 2040.3(f) of this Part to the extent a project addresses the division’s underwriting and design standards, as set forth in a request for proposals. Any special priorities or demonstration programs shall be consistent with priorities and selection criteria set forth herein and shall be described in detail in the notice of credit availability and requests for proposals. Notwithstanding the scoring system set forth above, the division reserves the right to deny any request for an allocation of SLIHC irrespective of its point ranking if such request is inconsistent with the State's housing goals including the housing objectives of a regional economic development council applicable to the area in which the project is located; and shall have the power to allocate SLIHC to a project irrespective of its point ranking, if such intended allocation is: in compliance with the law; in furtherance of the State's housing goals; including the housing objectives of a regional economic development council applicable to the area in which the project is located; and determined by the commissioner to be in the interests of the citizens of the State of New York. A written explanation shall be available to the general public for any allocation of a housing credit dollar amount which is not made in accordance with established priorities and the selection criteria set forth herein.

(g)Set-asides.

The division reserves the right to set aside credit for the purpose of implementing the State’s housing goals, including the housing objectives of the regional economic development council applicable to the area in which the project is located, the division reserves the right to set aside credit, including, but not limited to, set-asides for housing opportunity projects, preservation projects and supportive housing projects.

9 NYCRR 2040.15 - [Repealed]

Repealed or removed in compiled source

The compiled source records this section as repealed. We hold the witnessed tombstone record; see the source for details.

Dates and status
Compiling agency
Executive Department
Text status
Source-only entry
Compiled text through
Sep 15, 2021
Register checked through
July 29, 2026/Vol. XLVIII, Issue 30 (2026-07-29)
Activity status
Later Register activity found — review the notice before relying on the compiled text.
Latest notice
HCR-04-25-00002-P · Proposed rule · Jan 29, 2025
Source snapshot
Jun 6, 2026

Back to top

LawEngine organizes New York regulations for fast review. Use independent legal judgment before filing.